Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marcel Harmon's avatar

You always share interesting essays. Thanks for sharing this excerpt from Svoboda’s book.

While I think these two statements are inherently true - "Personal pacing facilitates shared pacing toward global-scale solutions" and "Yet if sustainable pacing practices are ever to emerge on a global scale, they must begin on a human one" - or individual actions facilitate needed collective actions, there’s also the chicken and egg lens that’s often used to frame the arguments between the importance of individual vs collective actions for creating needed, rapid change.

Changes to our socio-political, governmental, and economic systems are required to facilitate the individual and collective behavior needed relative to climate actions, decarbonization, environmental/social justice, wealth redistribution, etc. But individuals are the heart of such changes – the initial sparks as well as the components that spur the collective on. Both are intertwined and essays (and I assume Svoboda’s book overall) get at that, though this has more of an individual focus.

I found Michael Brownstein’s, Alex Madva’s, and Daniel Kelly’s recent book – Somebody Should Do Something: How Anyone Can Help Create Social Change - https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262049788/somebody-should-do-something/ - a useful look at how the individual and collective are intertwined as well as the types of individual actions that are the most useful for generating intended collective action.

The following quotes (including your title) generated some ties to my day-to-day work, though not specifically relative to the focus of this essay.

• "Your Obsession With Productivity Is Destroying The Planet: How to sustainably manage energy, not just time"

• "These failures are rooted in a rugged ethos of one-upmanship that’s proved ferociously sticky in the United States and societies that follow its lead. This ethos stems from other, still deeper-rooted ideas—that the best way to live is to aggrandize the self, and that in order for someone to win, someone else must lose. These entrenched ideas have spawned a succession of social ills: an economic system that prizes growth over long-term sustainability;..."

• "Faced with counterproductive modes of juicing productivity, it’s easy to conclude we’re stuck with them for good."

Part of my focus (and that of my colleagues) is to help our clients, building owners, communities, and society sustainably manage the energy consumption of their built environments (while also creating environments where everyone can equitably thrive within), so that we don’t destroy the planet. But these large socio-political, governmental, and economic factors constrain the decisions many developers and building owners feel they can make – and modeling impacts on various aspects of that dreaded productivity (and health and learning) can actually be the difference that results in more prosocial decisions (e.g., Gaming the System - https://marcelharmon67.substack.com/p/gaming-the-system?r=1mijet).

So, using this societal / capitalistic obsession with short-term profits against itself. Though I also wonder if we’re reinforcing that obsession to a degree.

Irene Keliher's avatar

This is personally challenging and crosses my path at the right moment, when I’m facing down the career path I’ve chosen and its costs to my wellbeing (and likely to society in a broader capitalist sense but I can’t quite go there, admittedly, yet). She might address this in the book, but I wonder about the role of childhood trauma and socioeconomic class, and I can’t help but reflexively feel that this pacing is easier for wealthy folks with secure attachments. That’s probably my own defensiveness kicking in. But for me, productivity has been linked to survival real or imagined for so long, that my hindbrain can’t get on board with slowing down. “You’ll lose the house!” She shouts at me, even as the current trajectory also feels like threat level Orange.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?